"Zone zero" is back in the news here. California passed its "zone zero" law in 2020 with the intention of creating five feet of "ember-resistant" areas surrounding homes located in very high fire risk areas. The State's Board of Forestry and Fire Protection was tasked with creating regulations and timelines for implementing the law by January 2023. That due date came and went as discussions moved to the back burner. I vaguely recall some general discussion of the topic back then but the wildfires in Southern California in January reignited the sense of urgency to publish the regulations and get moving on implementing them in 2026. However, according to an article published in the in the Los Angeles Times on November 3rd, the discussion remains heated and the current deadline of December 31, 2025 is likely to be missed once again. Among other things, critics believe the emphasis on healthy, well-irrigated plants may be overblown and actions to harden homes would be more meaningful. They point out that there's little scientific research to demonstrate which actions with respect to plants are effective in controlling ignitions of home structures. In addition, while it could be relatively easy to regulate landscaping around new homes, it could be difficult to impose the same regulations on existing homeowners who could face significant financial burdens to alter their hardscaping and landscapes.
I recently learned that my own house is in a "green" zone due to a reappraisal of fire risk zones in my area. At present, our property isn't subject to any regulations the State eventually adopts, which I assume includes those related to "zone zero." So why do I care about the pending regulations? I care because some homes in my own neighborhood do fall into high risk zones and it's hard to understand how fires affecting homes within a few minutes walking distance wouldn't present a real threat to my own home. In addition, I've seen what wildfires can do. My in-laws lost their home of twenty years to a wildfire in 1993. And I'm nervous every time residents living around us set off illegal fireworks.
According to the LA Times article, even "zone zero" critics agree on certain aspects of the regulations under discussion, including the need to remove wooden structures attached to a house. We previously removed a wooden arbor on the south side of our house but this week my husband and I agreed to address two other such structures. The fence bisecting the north side of our garden is the first of these.
| The fence's gate and its connection to the house is gone but the effort involved reinforced the need for outside help with removing the rest of the fence and the second project |
| The fence itself is beefier than it may look at first glance. There are multiple posts backed by wood planks on both sides. |
| This is what's left of the gate and the boards that had connected the fence to the house itself |
| Views of the west and east sides of the fence that remains. At its end, our fence connects to another wood fence that separates our property from than of our neighbor on the north side, |
The other area of concern is the arbor attached to the front of the house.
| My husband sees signs of rot in the wood and, when I looked at the overhead beams I was surprised to see what I believe is lichen growing on them |
The wood mulch surrounding the Magnolia tree in the front garden should probably go too, although some critics question the necessity of that. There was grass there when we moved it but it didn't thrive even with the heavy watering the prior owner gave it and we took it all out. I've tried a couple of groundcovers there with limited success as competition with the tree's roots is fierce.
| Photo of the area in question taken in early October. Before I take the step of hauling in gravel, maybe I'll try adding something like Carex divulsa (aka woodland sedge) in spots there first. |
I'm not entirely happy with the area I cleared at the back of our house outside the living and dining room windows earlier this year; however, I've finished tweaking it for the time being. As the plants settle in and fill out, I may feel better about it.
As may be apparent, I'm feeling a little overwhelmed at the moment.
All material © 2012-2025 by Kris Peterson for Late to the Garden Party
It is a shame you have to do all this, especially removing the pergola, but understandable because of the fire possibility. I assume that you are still in drought mode - do you ever go out of that designation now?
ReplyDeleteGiven your location, I'd be taking the risk seriously, too! You'd be crazy not to. I like your lower profile re-do outside the window. You've got so much going on. The portion of fence you have removed offers a nice view, does it feel nice to have it "opened up"?
ReplyDeleteThat is a lot of balls in the air, maybe too many for comfort. The proposed landscape fire regs shifting constantly doesn't help things either. I'm wondering how the insurance industry is treating PV in general. We were kicked off our insurance after decades, with no claims made, and had to scrounge to find new coverage. You've done so much remediation and already have a lot of new planting done, so you're well ahead. The remaining fence and pergola could be outsourced and done in a day and then maybe you can relax a bit. At least you're in for cooler temps! Looking forward to seeing you again.
ReplyDelete